Who is better, Tilden or Evert?
Bill Tilden leads with a GOAT score of 91.8 against 91.5 for Chris Evert — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bill Tilden above Chris Evert: 91.8 vs 91.5. Bill Tilden leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Chris Evert leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Tilden wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Evert wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/bill-tilden-vs-chris-evert
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Tilden leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Tilden | 0 | 0 | 40 | 86 | 195 | 569 |
| 🇺🇸 Evert | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 43 | 92 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | TildenRetired | EvertRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major singles titles | 10 | — |
| US Championships titles | 7 | — |
| Wimbledon titles | 3 | — |
| Davis Cup titles | 7 | — |
| Years ranked world number one | 6 | — |
| Grand Slam titles | — | 18 |
| French Open titles | — | 7 |
| Career titles | — | 157 |
| Weeks at No. 1 | — | 260 |
| Match wins | — | 1,309 |
| Grand Slam semi-finals | — | 52 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 91 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 91 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 91 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 93 |
Bill Tilden leads with a GOAT score of 91.8 against 91.5 for Chris Evert — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Evert scores higher on statistics, longevity. Tilden leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Tilden: 91.8, Evert: 91.5.
Make your case for Tilden vs Evert. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.