Who is better, Tilden or Court?
Margaret Court leads with a GOAT score of 92.5 against 91.8 for Bill Tilden — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Margaret Court above Bill Tilden: 92.5 vs 91.8. Margaret Court leads on Statistics, Longevity. Bill Tilden leads on Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Court wins: Longevity, Statistics
Tilden wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/bill-tilden-vs-margaret-court
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Court leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Tilden | 0 | 0 | 40 | 86 | 195 | 569 |
| 🇦🇺 Court | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 24 | 81 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | TildenRetired | CourtRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major singles titles | 10 | — |
| US Championships titles | 7 | — |
| Wimbledon titles | 3 | — |
| Davis Cup titles | 7 | — |
| Years ranked world number one | 6 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 24 |
| Grand Slam titles (all) | — | 64 |
| Calendar Grand Slams | — | 1 |
| Career singles titles | — | 192 |
| Year-end No. 1 | — | 7 |
| Match wins | — | 1,180 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 93 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 93 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 95 |
Margaret Court leads with a GOAT score of 92.5 against 91.8 for Bill Tilden — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Tilden scores higher on peak, dominance. Court leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Tilden: 91.8, Court: 92.5.
Make your case for Tilden vs Court. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.