Who is better, King or Wills Moody?
Helen Wills Moody leads with a GOAT score of 90.5 against 89.8 for Billie Jean King — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Helen Wills Moody above Billie Jean King: 90.5 vs 89.8. Helen Wills Moody leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Billie Jean King leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Wills Moody wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
King wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/billie-jean-king-vs-helen-wills-moody
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wills Moody leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 King | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 42 |
| 🇺🇸 Wills Moody | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KingRetired | Wills MoodyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 12 | 19 |
| Grand Slam titles (all) | 39 | — |
| Wimbledon titles (all) | 20 | — |
| Career singles titles | 129 | 100 |
| Year-end No. 1 | 5 | — |
| Fed Cups | 7 | — |
| Wimbledon titles | — | 8 |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| US Championships titles | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 91 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 92 |
Helen Wills Moody leads with a GOAT score of 90.5 against 89.8 for Billie Jean King — a gap of 0.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
King scores higher on longevity. Wills Moody leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. King: 89.8, Wills Moody: 90.5.
Make your case for King vs Wills Moody. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.