Who is better, King or L. Doherty?
Billie Jean King leads with a GOAT score of 89.8 against 89.2 for Laurence Doherty — a gap of 0.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Billie Jean King above Laurence Doherty: 89.8 vs 89.2. Billie Jean King leads on Longevity. Laurence Doherty leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →King wins: Longevity
L. Doherty wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/billie-jean-king-vs-laurence-doherty
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
King leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 King | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 42 |
| 🏴 L. Doherty | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 283 | 631 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KingRetired | L. DohertyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 12 | — |
| Grand Slam titles (all) | 39 | — |
| Wimbledon titles (all) | 20 | — |
| Career singles titles | 129 | — |
| Year-end No. 1 | 5 | — |
| Fed Cups | 7 | — |
| Wimbledon singles titles | — | 5 |
| US Championships | — | 1 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 3 |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 4 |
| Major doubles titles | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 91 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 92 |
Billie Jean King leads with a GOAT score of 89.8 against 89.2 for Laurence Doherty — a gap of 0.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
L. Doherty scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. King leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. King: 89.8, L. Doherty: 89.2.
Make your case for King vs L. Doherty. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.