Who is better, King or Brough?
Louise Brough leads with a GOAT score of 90.7 against 89.8 for Billie Jean King — a gap of 0.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Louise Brough above Billie Jean King: 90.7 vs 89.8. Louise Brough leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance. Billie Jean King leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Brough wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
King wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/billie-jean-king-vs-louise-brough
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Brough leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 King | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 42 |
| 🇺🇸 Brough | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 33 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KingRetired | BroughRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 12 | 6 |
| Grand Slam titles (all) | 39 | — |
| Wimbledon titles (all) | 20 | — |
| Career singles titles | 129 | — |
| Year-end No. 1 | 5 | — |
| Fed Cups | 7 | — |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | — | 21 |
| Grand Slam mixed titles | — | 8 |
| Wimbledon singles titles | — | 4 |
| Wightman Cup ties won | — | 22 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 91 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 92 |
Louise Brough leads with a GOAT score of 90.7 against 89.8 for Billie Jean King — a gap of 0.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
King scores higher on longevity. Brough leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. King: 89.8, Brough: 90.7.
Make your case for King vs Brough. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.