Who is better, Barnes or Wyatt-Hodge?
Danni Wyatt-Hodge leads with a GOAT score of 83.7 against 83.6 for Billy Barnes — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Danni Wyatt-Hodge above Billy Barnes: 83.7 vs 83.6. Danni Wyatt-Hodge leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics. Billy Barnes leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Wyatt-Hodge wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Barnes wins: Dominance
Shareable URL · /compare/billy-barnes-vs-danni-wyatt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wyatt-Hodge leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Barnes | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 273 | 578 |
| 🇬🇧 Wyatt-Hodge | 0 | 0 | 18 | 42 | 144 | 326 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BarnesRetired | Wyatt-HodgeActive |
|---|---|---|
| Test runs | 725 | — |
| Test wickets | 51 | — |
| Test centuries | 1 | — |
| First-class runs | 15,490 | — |
| First-class wickets | 872 | — |
| T20 World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| T20I runs | — | 3,000 |
| T20I centuries | — | 2 |
| ODI runs | — | 1,500 |
| International seasons | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Danni Wyatt-Hodge leads with a GOAT score of 83.7 against 83.6 for Billy Barnes — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Barnes scores higher on dominance. Wyatt-Hodge leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Barnes: 83.6, Wyatt-Hodge: 83.7.
Make your case for Barnes vs Wyatt-Hodge. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.