Who is better, Bremner or Falcao?
Billy Bremner leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 83.0 for Radamel Falcao — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Billy Bremner and Radamel Falcao level at 83.0. Billy Bremner leads on Longevity, Dominance, Honours. Radamel Falcao leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bremner wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Falcao wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/billy-bremner-vs-radamel-falcao
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bremner leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Bremner | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 278 | 624 |
| 🇨🇴 Falcao | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 186 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BremnerRetired | FalcaoActive |
|---|---|---|
| League titles | 2 | — |
| FA Cups | 1 | — |
| Inter-Cities Fairs Cups | 2 | — |
| FWA Footballer of the Year | 1 | — |
| Scotland caps | 54 | — |
| Europa League titles | — | 2 |
| Europa League goals in 2010–11 | — | 17 |
| Colombia goals | — | 36 |
| Portuguese league titles | — | 1 |
| Copa del Rey titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 88 |
Billy Bremner leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 83.0 for Radamel Falcao — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Falcao scores higher on peak, statistics. Bremner leads on dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bremner: 83.0, Falcao: 83.0.
Make your case for Bremner vs Falcao. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.