Who is better, Burch or Holst?
Billy Burch leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.1 for Erika Holst — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Billy Burch and Erika Holst level at 83.1. Billy Burch leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Erika Holst leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Burch wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Holst wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/billy-burch-vs-erika-holst
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Burch leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Burch | 0 | 0 | 58 | 128 | 393 | 693 |
| 🇸🇪 Holst | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 94 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Billy Burch leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.1 for Erika Holst — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Holst scores higher on statistics, longevity. Burch leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Burch: 83.1, Holst: 83.1.
Make your case for Burch vs Holst. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.