Who is better, Conn or Baldwin?
Billy Conn leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.7 for Caleb Baldwin — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Conn vs Baldwin
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Billy Conn and Caleb Baldwin level at 84.7. Billy Conn leads on Peak, Honours. Caleb Baldwin leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ConnWinner
84.7Conn wins: Peak, Honours
Baldwin
84.7Baldwin wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/billy-conn-vs-caleb-baldwin
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Billy Conn
84.7
Conn leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Billy Conn
2. Caleb Baldwin
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Billy Conn5 years played · career day 1,825281 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Caleb Baldwin5 years played · career day 1,825265 title wins
-5.7% vs Conn at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Conn | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 281 | 634 |
| 🇬🇧 Baldwin | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 265 | 549 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Conn84.7
Baldwin84.7
FAQ
Where does Baldwin beat Conn?
Baldwin scores higher on longevity. Conn leads on peak, honours.
How is the Conn vs Baldwin score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Conn: 84.7, Baldwin: 84.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Conn vs Baldwin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.