Who is better, Cunningham or Parish?
Billy Cunningham leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.5 for Robert Parish — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Billy Cunningham and Robert Parish level at 84.5. Billy Cunningham leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Robert Parish leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cunningham wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Parish wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/billy-cunningham-vs-robert-parish
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cunningham leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Cunningham | 0 | 0 | 14.3 | 32.8 | 101.3 | 193.1 |
| 🇺🇸 Parish | 0 | 0 | 9.1 | 21.6 | 55.8 | 151.4 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CunninghamRetired | ParishRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles as player | 1 | — |
| NBA titles as coach | 1 | — |
| ABA MVP awards | 1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 4 | 9 |
| Career points per game | 20.8 | — |
| NBA titles | — | 4 |
| Games played | — | 1,611 |
| Career points | — | 23,334 |
| Career rebounds | — | 14,715 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Billy Cunningham leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.5 for Robert Parish — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Parish scores higher on longevity. Cunningham leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cunningham: 84.5, Parish: 84.5.
Make your case for Cunningham vs Parish. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.