Who is better, Graham or Chocolate?
Billy Graham leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.2 for Kid Chocolate — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Billy Graham above Kid Chocolate: 86.3 vs 86.2. Billy Graham leads on Longevity, Statistics. Kid Chocolate leads on Honours, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Graham wins: Longevity, Statistics
Chocolate wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/billy-graham-boxer-vs-kid-chocolate
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Graham leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Graham | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 279 | 601 |
| 🇨🇺 Chocolate | 0 | 0 | 30 | 55 | 93 | 143 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GrahamRetired | ChocolateRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career wins | 102 | — |
| Career fights | 126 | — |
| Knockdowns suffered | 0 | — |
| World title challenges | 2 | — |
| Seasons active | 15 | — |
| World titles won | — | 2 |
| Professional wins | — | 136 |
| Knockout wins | — | 51 |
| Professional losses | — | 10 |
| Professional bouts | — | 152 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 90 |
Billy Graham leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.2 for Kid Chocolate — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chocolate scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Graham leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Graham: 86.3, Chocolate: 86.2.
Make your case for Graham vs Chocolate. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.