Who is better, Maroof or Shaheen?
Bismah Maroof leads with a GOAT score of 84.1 against 84.0 for Shaheen Shah Afridi — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bismah Maroof above Shaheen Shah Afridi: 84.1 vs 84.0. Bismah Maroof leads on Longevity. Shaheen Shah Afridi leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Maroof wins: Longevity
Shaheen wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/bismah-maroof-vs-shaheen-afridi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Maroof leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇰 Maroof | 0 | 0 | 18 | 42 | 144 | 326 |
| 🇵🇰 Shaheen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 180 | 386 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MaroofRetired | ShaheenActive · Lahore Qalandars |
|---|---|---|
| ODI runs | 3,000 | — |
| T20I runs | 2,500 | — |
| Asian Games golds | 2 | — |
| Matches as captain | 78 | — |
| International seasons | 17 | — |
| ICC Cricketer of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Test wickets | — | 120 |
| ODI wickets | — | 130 |
| T20I wickets | — | 100 |
| Champions Trophy titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 92 |
Bismah Maroof leads with a GOAT score of 84.1 against 84.0 for Shaheen Shah Afridi — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shaheen scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Maroof leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Maroof: 84.1, Shaheen: 84.0.
Make your case for Maroof vs Shaheen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.