Who is better, Bjergsen or GorillA?
Kang "GorillA" Beom-hyeon leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.7 for Søren "Bjergsen" Bjerg — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kang "GorillA" Beom-hyeon above Søren "Bjergsen" Bjerg: 85.8 vs 85.7. Kang "GorillA" Beom-hyeon leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Søren "Bjergsen" Bjerg leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GorillA wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Bjergsen wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/bjergsen-lol-vs-es-gorilla
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
GorillA leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 Bjergsen | 0 | 0 | 58 | 126 | 388 | 748 |
| 🇰🇷 GorillA | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 375 | 560 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BjergsenRetired | GorillARetired |
|---|---|---|
| LCS titles | 6 | — |
| LCS MVP awards | 3 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 6 | — |
| Mid-Season Invitational appearances | 2 | — |
| Professional seasons | 12 | — |
| LCK titles | — | 1 |
| World Championship semi-finals | — | 2 |
| Seasons played | — | 8 |
| All-star appearances | — | 2 |
| Career assists | — | 4,000 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Kang "GorillA" Beom-hyeon leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.7 for Søren "Bjergsen" Bjerg — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bjergsen scores higher on longevity. GorillA leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bjergsen: 85.7, GorillA: 85.8.
Make your case for Bjergsen vs GorillA. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.