Who is better, Bjergsen or JerAx?
Søren "Bjergsen" Bjerg leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 85.6 for Jesse "JerAx" Vainikka — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Søren "Bjergsen" Bjerg above Jesse "JerAx" Vainikka: 85.7 vs 85.6. Søren "Bjergsen" Bjerg leads on Longevity, Statistics. Jesse "JerAx" Vainikka leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bjergsen wins: Longevity, Statistics
JerAx wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/bjergsen-lol-vs-jerax-dota
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bjergsen leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 Bjergsen | 0 | 0 | 58 | 126 | 388 | 748 |
| 🇫🇮 JerAx | 0 | 0 | 55 | 119 | 269 | 701 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BjergsenRetired | JerAxRetired |
|---|---|---|
| LCS titles | 6 | — |
| LCS MVP awards | 3 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 6 | — |
| Mid-Season Invitational appearances | 2 | — |
| Professional seasons | 12 | 9 |
| The International titles | — | 2 |
| Major titles | — | 4 |
| The International appearances | — | 6 |
| Career prize money (USD m) | — | 6.4 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Søren "Bjergsen" Bjerg leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 85.6 for Jesse "JerAx" Vainikka — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
JerAx scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Bjergsen leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bjergsen: 85.7, JerAx: 85.6.
Make your case for Bjergsen vs JerAx. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.