Who is better, Griffin or Lillard?
Blake Griffin leads with a GOAT score of 78.9 against 78.7 for Damian Lillard — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Blake Griffin above Damian Lillard: 78.9 vs 78.7. Blake Griffin leads on Peak, Longevity, Honours. Damian Lillard leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Griffin wins: Peak, Longevity, Honours
Lillard wins: Dominance
Shareable URL · /compare/blake-griffin-vs-damian-lillard
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Griffin leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Griffin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.5 | 85.3 | 174.7 |
| 🇺🇸 Lillard | 0 | 0 | 19 | 39.7 | 85.8 | 224.3 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GriffinRetired | LillardActive · Portland Trail Blazers |
|---|---|---|
| All-Star selections | 6 | 9 |
| Rookie of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| Dunk contest wins | 1 | — |
| All-NBA teams | 5 | — |
| Points per game peak | 24.5 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| All-NBA selections | — | 7 |
| Career points per game | — | 25.1 |
| Career three-pointers | — | 2,600 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Blake Griffin leads with a GOAT score of 78.9 against 78.7 for Damian Lillard — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lillard scores higher on dominance. Griffin leads on peak, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Griffin: 78.9, Lillard: 78.7.
Make your case for Griffin vs Lillard. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.