GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Appleyard vs Crowe

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AppleyardWinner
84.4

Appleyard wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Crowe
84.4

Crowe wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/bob-appleyard-vs-martin-crowe

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Bob Appleyard
84.4

Appleyard leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Took 200 wickets in his first full season and never lost a Test he played.

1. Bob Appleyard
84.4
2. Martin Crowe
84.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Bob Appleyard5 years played · career day 1,825398 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇳🇿 Martin Crowe5 years played · career day 1,825243 runs
-38.9% vs Appleyard at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Appleyard0060158398592
🇳🇿 Crowe003577243559

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricAppleyardRetiredCroweRetired
Wickets in debut season200
First-class wickets708
First-class average15
Test wickets31
Tests lost0
Test runs5,444
Test centuries17
Tests played77
Highest score299
ODI runs4,704
Dominance w25%8682
Peak w20%9492
Longevity w20%7080
Honours w20%8080
Statistics w15%9490

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Appleyard84.4
Crowe84.4
The people
Appleyard
Crowe

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Appleyard vs Crowe. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →