Who is better, Appleyard or Dar?
Nida Dar leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.4 for Bob Appleyard — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Nida Dar above Bob Appleyard: 84.6 vs 84.4. Nida Dar leads on Longevity. Bob Appleyard leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Dar wins: Longevity
Appleyard wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/bob-appleyard-vs-nida-dar
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Dar leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Appleyard | 0 | 0 | 60 | 158 | 398 | 592 |
| 🇵🇰 Dar | 0 | 0 | 10 | 26 | 98 | 234 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AppleyardRetired | DarActive |
|---|---|---|
| Wickets in debut season | 200 | — |
| First-class wickets | 708 | — |
| First-class average | 15 | — |
| Test wickets | 31 | — |
| Tests lost | 0 | — |
| T20I wickets | — | 141 |
| ODI wickets | — | 80 |
| T20I runs | — | 2,000 |
| Asian Games golds | — | 1 |
| International seasons | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 92 |
Nida Dar leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.4 for Bob Appleyard — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Appleyard scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Dar leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Appleyard: 84.4, Dar: 84.6.
Make your case for Appleyard vs Dar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.