Who is better, Falkenburg or Martínez?
Bob Falkenburg leads with a GOAT score of 82.1 against 82.0 for Conchita Martínez — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bob Falkenburg above Conchita Martínez: 82.1 vs 82.0. Bob Falkenburg leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Conchita Martínez leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Falkenburg wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Martínez wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/bob-falkenburg-vs-conchita-martinez
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Falkenburg leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Falkenburg | 0 | 0 | 50 | 112 | 270 | 670 |
| 🇪🇸 Martínez | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 29 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FalkenburgRetired | MartínezRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | 1 |
| Wimbledon doubles titles | 1 | — |
| Match points saved in the 1948 final | 3 | — |
| Seasons played | 12 | — |
| US doubles titles | 1 | — |
| WTA titles | — | 33 |
| Fed Cup titles | — | 5 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| Career-high ranking | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 84 |
Bob Falkenburg leads with a GOAT score of 82.1 against 82.0 for Conchita Martínez — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Martínez scores higher on longevity. Falkenburg leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Falkenburg: 82.1, Martínez: 82.0.
Make your case for Falkenburg vs Martínez. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.