GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Falkenburg vs Martínez

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FalkenburgWinner
82.1

Falkenburg wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Martínez
82.0

Martínez wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/bob-falkenburg-vs-conchita-martinez

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Bob Falkenburg
82.1

Falkenburg leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Saved three match points to win Wimbledon in 1948.

1. Bob Falkenburg
82.1
2. Conchita Martínez
82.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Bob Falkenburg5 seasons played · career day 1,826366 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇪🇸 Conchita Martínez5 seasons played · career day 1,82613 titles
-96.4% vs Falkenburg at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Falkenburg0050112270670
🇪🇸 Martínez00131029

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricFalkenburgRetiredMartínezRetired
Grand Slam singles titles11
Wimbledon doubles titles1
Match points saved in the 1948 final3
Seasons played12
US doubles titles1
WTA titles33
Fed Cup titles5
Olympic medals3
Career-high ranking2
Dominance w25%7876
Peak w20%9286
Longevity w20%7686
Honours w20%8280
Statistics w15%8484

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Falkenburg82.1
Martínez82.0
The people
Falkenburg
Martínez

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Falkenburg vs Martínez. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →