Who is better, Falkenburg or Brookes?
Bob Falkenburg leads with a GOAT score of 82.1 against 82.1 for Norman Brookes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Bob Falkenburg and Norman Brookes level at 82.1. Bob Falkenburg leads on Statistics, Peak, Longevity. Norman Brookes leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Falkenburg wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Brookes wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/bob-falkenburg-vs-norman-brookes
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Falkenburg leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Falkenburg | 0 | 0 | 50 | 112 | 270 | 670 |
| 🇦🇺 Brookes | 0 | 0 | 48 | 108 | 356 | 696 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FalkenburgRetired | BrookesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| Wimbledon doubles titles | 1 | — |
| Match points saved in the 1948 final | 3 | — |
| Seasons played | 12 | — |
| US doubles titles | 1 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 3 |
| Wimbledon titles | — | 2 |
| Australasian titles | — | 1 |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 4 |
| Major finals | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 80 |
Bob Falkenburg leads with a GOAT score of 82.1 against 82.1 for Norman Brookes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Brookes scores higher on dominance, honours. Falkenburg leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Falkenburg: 82.1, Brookes: 82.1.
Make your case for Falkenburg vs Brookes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.