Who is better, Fitzsimmons or Berg?
Bob Fitzsimmons leads with a GOAT score of 90.1 against 89.2 for Jack "Kid" Berg — a gap of 0.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bob Fitzsimmons above Jack "Kid" Berg: 90.1 vs 89.2. Bob Fitzsimmons leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Jack "Kid" Berg leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fitzsimmons wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Berg wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/bob-fitzsimmons-vs-jack-kid-berg
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fitzsimmons leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Fitzsimmons | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| 🇬🇧 Berg | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 246 | 692 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FitzsimmonsRetired | BergRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles in divisions | 3 | — |
| Professional wins | 68 | — |
| Career knockouts | 59 | — |
| Professional bouts | 92 | — |
| Career span in years | 31 | — |
| World title reigns | — | 1 |
| Career wins | — | 157 |
| Career fights | — | 192 |
| Knockouts | — | 61 |
| Seasons active | — | 22 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 94 |
Bob Fitzsimmons leads with a GOAT score of 90.1 against 89.2 for Jack "Kid" Berg — a gap of 0.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Berg scores higher on statistics, longevity. Fitzsimmons leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fitzsimmons: 90.1, Berg: 89.2.
Make your case for Fitzsimmons vs Berg. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.