Who is better, Johnson or Harvey?
Doug Harvey leads with a GOAT score of 93.0 against 87.7 for Bob Johnson — a gap of 5.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Doug Harvey above Bob Johnson: 93.0 vs 87.7. Doug Harvey leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Harvey wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Johnson wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/bob-johnson-hockey-vs-doug-harvey
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Harvey leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Johnson — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Johnson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 🇨🇦 Harvey | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 303 | 642 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JohnsonRetired | HarveyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Stanley Cups | 1 | 6 |
| NCAA championships | 3 | — |
| NHL coaching wins | 234 | — |
| World Championship medals as coach | 1 | — |
| Seasons as a head coach | 22 | — |
| Norris Trophies | — | 7 |
| First-team All-Star selections | — | 10 |
| Games played | — | 1,113 |
| Career assists | — | 452 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 96 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 90 |
Doug Harvey leads with a GOAT score of 93.0 against 87.7 for Bob Johnson — a gap of 5.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Johnson does not lead any of the five categories; Harvey is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Johnson: 87.7, Harvey: 93.0.
Make your case for Johnson vs Harvey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.