Who is better, Johnson or Howe?
Gordie Howe leads with a GOAT score of 94.2 against 87.7 for Bob Johnson — a gap of 6.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Gordie Howe above Bob Johnson: 94.2 vs 87.7. Gordie Howe leads on Longevity, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Howe wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Johnson wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/bob-johnson-hockey-vs-gordie-howe
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Howe leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Johnson — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Johnson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 🇨🇦 Howe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 86 | 427 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JohnsonRetired | HoweRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Stanley Cups | 1 | 4 |
| NCAA championships | 3 | — |
| NHL coaching wins | 234 | — |
| World Championship medals as coach | 1 | — |
| Seasons as a head coach | 22 | — |
| Hart Trophies | — | 6 |
| Art Ross Trophies | — | 6 |
| NHL points | — | 1,850 |
| NHL goals | — | 801 |
| All-Star selections | — | 23 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 93 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 99 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 93 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 94 |
Gordie Howe leads with a GOAT score of 94.2 against 87.7 for Bob Johnson — a gap of 6.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Johnson does not lead any of the five categories; Howe is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Johnson: 87.7, Howe: 94.2.
Make your case for Johnson vs Howe. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.