Who is better, Johnson or Fetisov?
Viacheslav Fetisov leads with a GOAT score of 92.1 against 87.7 for Bob Johnson — a gap of 4.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Viacheslav Fetisov above Bob Johnson: 92.1 vs 87.7. Viacheslav Fetisov leads on Honours, Dominance, Longevity. Bob Johnson leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fetisov wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours
Johnson wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/bob-johnson-hockey-vs-viacheslav-fetisov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fetisov leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Johnson — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Johnson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 🇷🇺 Fetisov | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 297 | 620 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JohnsonRetired | FetisovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Stanley Cups | 1 | 2 |
| NCAA championships | 3 | — |
| NHL coaching wins | 234 | — |
| World Championship medals as coach | 1 | — |
| Seasons as a head coach | 22 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship titles | — | 7 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 13 |
| Golden Stick awards | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 96 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Viacheslav Fetisov leads with a GOAT score of 92.1 against 87.7 for Bob Johnson — a gap of 4.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Johnson scores higher on statistics. Fetisov leads on peak, dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Johnson: 87.7, Fetisov: 92.1.
Make your case for Johnson vs Fetisov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.