Who is better, Kurland or Dampier?
Louie Dampier leads with a GOAT score of 85.2 against 85.1 for Bob Kurland — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Louie Dampier above Bob Kurland: 85.2 vs 85.1. Louie Dampier leads on Longevity, Statistics. Bob Kurland leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Dampier wins: Longevity, Statistics
Kurland wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/bob-kurland-vs-louie-dampier
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Dampier leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Kurland | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 60.6 | 122.6 |
| 🇺🇸 Dampier | 0 | 0 | 20.6 | 45.4 | 114.9 | 175.4 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KurlandRetired | DampierRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| NCAA titles | 2 | — |
| NCAA tournament MVP awards | 2 | — |
| AAU national titles | 3 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| ABA championships | — | 1 |
| ABA All-Star selections | — | 7 |
| ABA career points | — | 13,726 |
| ABA career assists | — | 4,044 |
| ABA three-pointers made | — | 794 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Louie Dampier leads with a GOAT score of 85.2 against 85.1 for Bob Kurland — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kurland scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Dampier leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kurland: 85.1, Dampier: 85.2.
Make your case for Kurland vs Dampier. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.