Who is better, Baun or Eliasson?
Emma Eliasson leads with a GOAT score of 81.1 against 81.0 for Bobby Baun — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Baun vs Eliasson
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Emma Eliasson above Bobby Baun: 81.1 vs 81.0. Emma Eliasson leads on Statistics, Dominance, Longevity. Bobby Baun leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
EliassonWinner
81.1Eliasson wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Baun
81.0Baun wins: Honours
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/bobby-baun-vs-emma-eliasson
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Emma Eliasson
81.1
Eliasson leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Emma Eliasson
2. Bobby Baun
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Bobby Baun5 seasons played · career day 2,19150 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Emma Eliasson5 seasons played · career day 2,55649 points
-2.0% vs Baun at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Baun | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 92 |
| 🇸🇪 Eliasson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 72 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Eliasson81.1
Baun81.0
FAQ
Where does Baun beat Eliasson?
Baun scores higher on honours. Eliasson leads on dominance, statistics, longevity.
How is the Baun vs Eliasson score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Baun: 81.0, Eliasson: 81.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Baun vs Eliasson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.