Who is better, Chacon or Apostoli?
Fred Apostoli leads with a GOAT score of 84.1 against 84.0 for Bobby Chacon — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Chacon vs Apostoli
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Fred Apostoli above Bobby Chacon: 84.1 vs 84.0. Fred Apostoli leads on Dominance, Honours. Bobby Chacon leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ApostoliWinner
84.1Apostoli wins: Dominance, Honours
Chacon
84.0Chacon wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/bobby-chacon-vs-fred-apostoli
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Fred Apostoli
84.1
Apostoli leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Fred Apostoli
2. Bobby Chacon
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Fred Apostoli5 years played · career day 1,825327 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Bobby Chacon5 years played · career day 1,826289 title wins
-11.6% vs Apostoli at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Chacon | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 218 | 635 |
| 🇺🇸 Apostoli | 0 | 0 | 45 | 100 | 327 | 667 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Apostoli84.1
Chacon84.0
FAQ
Where does Chacon beat Apostoli?
Chacon scores higher on longevity. Apostoli leads on dominance, honours.
How is the Chacon vs Apostoli score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chacon: 84.0, Apostoli: 84.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Chacon vs Apostoli. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.