Who is better, Charlton or Panico?
Patrizia Panico leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 89.9 for Bobby Charlton — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Patrizia Panico above Bobby Charlton: 90.0 vs 89.9. Patrizia Panico leads on Statistics, Longevity, Dominance. Bobby Charlton leads on Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Panico wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Charlton wins: Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/bobby-charlton-vs-patrizia-panico-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Panico leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Charlton | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 229 | 623 |
| 🇮🇹 Panico | 0 | 0 | 52 | 108 | 296 | 598 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CharltonRetired | PanicoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Ballon d'Or awards | 1 | — |
| European Cup titles | 1 | — |
| England goals | 49 | — |
| United appearances | 758 | — |
| Italy caps | — | 204 |
| Italy goals | — | 110 |
| Serie A titles | — | 7 |
| Serie A top scorer awards | — | 9 |
| Career goals | — | 500 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 96 |
Patrizia Panico leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 89.9 for Bobby Charlton — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Charlton scores higher on peak, honours. Panico leads on dominance, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Charlton: 89.9, Panico: 90.0.
Make your case for Charlton vs Panico. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.