Who is better, McDermott or Jeannette?
Buddy Jeannette leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.3 for Bobby McDermott — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Buddy Jeannette above Bobby McDermott: 84.6 vs 84.3. Buddy Jeannette leads on Longevity, Honours. Bobby McDermott leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Jeannette wins: Longevity, Honours
McDermott wins: Dominance
Shareable URL · /compare/bobby-mcdermott-vs-buddy-jeannette
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Jeannette leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 McDermott | 0 | 0 | 58 | 124 | 358 | 728 |
| 🇺🇸 Jeannette | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 38 | 80 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | McDermottRetired | JeannetteRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBL Most Valuable Player awards | 1 | — |
| World Professional Tournament titles | 3 | — |
| NBL championships | 2 | — |
| All-NBL first team selections | 7 | — |
| Hall of Fame induction | 1,988 | — |
| NBL MVP awards | — | 4 |
| Championships | — | 5 |
| Seasons played | — | 12 |
| Career points per game | — | 9.3 |
| Hall of Fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Buddy Jeannette leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.3 for Bobby McDermott — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McDermott scores higher on dominance. Jeannette leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McDermott: 84.3, Jeannette: 84.6.
Make your case for McDermott vs Jeannette. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.