GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Riggs vs Lenglen

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RiggsWinner
85.8

Riggs wins: Longevity

Lenglen
85.8

Lenglen wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/bobby-riggs-vs-suzanne-lenglen

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Bobby Riggs
85.8

Riggs leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Won the 1939 Wimbledon triple and three major singles titles.

1. Bobby Riggs
85.8
2. Suzanne Lenglen
85.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Bobby Riggs5 seasons played · career day 1,826367 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇫🇷 Suzanne Lenglen5 seasons played · career day 1,82516 titles
-95.6% vs Riggs at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Riggs004099274701
🇫🇷 Lenglen00251625

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricRiggsRetiredLenglenRetired
Major singles titles3
Wimbledon titles in one year3
World professional titles3
US Championships2
Years ranked world number one3
Grand Slam singles titles8
Olympic golds2
Career singles titles83
Career match losses7
Wimbledon titles6
Dominance w25%8494
Peak w20%9494
Longevity w20%8062
Honours w20%8488
Statistics w15%8890

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Riggs85.8
Lenglen85.8
The people
Riggs
Lenglen

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Riggs vs Lenglen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →