Who is better, Riggs or Lenglen?
Bobby Riggs leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.8 for Suzanne Lenglen — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Bobby Riggs and Suzanne Lenglen level at 85.8. Bobby Riggs leads on Longevity. Suzanne Lenglen leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Riggs wins: Longevity
Lenglen wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/bobby-riggs-vs-suzanne-lenglen
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Riggs leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Riggs | 0 | 0 | 40 | 99 | 274 | 701 |
| 🇫🇷 Lenglen | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 16 | 25 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RiggsRetired | LenglenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major singles titles | 3 | — |
| Wimbledon titles in one year | 3 | — |
| World professional titles | 3 | — |
| US Championships | 2 | — |
| Years ranked world number one | 3 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 8 |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| Career singles titles | — | 83 |
| Career match losses | — | 7 |
| Wimbledon titles | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Bobby Riggs leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.8 for Suzanne Lenglen — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lenglen scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Riggs leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Riggs: 85.8, Lenglen: 85.8.
Make your case for Riggs vs Lenglen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.