Who is better, Kapás or Beardsley?
Boglárka Kapás leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.5 for Craig Beardsley — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Boglárka Kapás and Craig Beardsley level at 80.5. Boglárka Kapás leads on Longevity, Honours. Craig Beardsley leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kapás wins: Longevity, Honours
Beardsley wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/boglarka-kapas-vs-craig-beardsley
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kapás leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇭🇺 Kapás | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 344 | 688 |
| 🇺🇸 Beardsley | 0 | 0 | 50 | 124 | 373 | 428 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KapásRetired | BeardsleyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| European titles | 3 | — |
| Hungarian records | 5 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| World records set | — | 2 |
| Pan American titles | — | 1 |
| US titles | — | 5 |
| NCAA titles | — | 2 |
| World ranking number ones | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 64 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 88 |
Boglárka Kapás leads with a GOAT score of 80.5 against 80.5 for Craig Beardsley — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Beardsley scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Kapás leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kapás: 80.5, Beardsley: 80.5.
Make your case for Kapás vs Beardsley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.