Who is better, Drča or Humana-Paredes?
Bojana Drča leads with a GOAT score of 81.1 against 81.1 for Melissa Humana-Paredes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Bojana Drča and Melissa Humana-Paredes level at 81.1. Bojana Drča leads on Longevity, Honours. Melissa Humana-Paredes leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Drča wins: Longevity, Honours
Humana-Paredes wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/bojana-drca-vs-melissa-humana-paredes
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Drča leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇸 Drča | 0 | 0 | 48 | 104 | 316 | 670 |
| 🇨🇦 Humana-Paredes | 0 | 0 | 52 | 114 | 356 | 714 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DrčaActive | Humana-ParedesActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 1 | 1 |
| Olympic medals | 1 | 1 |
| European Championship titles | 2 | — |
| Nations League medals | 2 | — |
| Years with the national team | 15 | — |
| World Tour wins | — | 12 |
| Commonwealth Games golds | — | 1 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 80 |
Bojana Drča leads with a GOAT score of 81.1 against 81.1 for Melissa Humana-Paredes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Humana-Paredes scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Drča leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Drča: 81.1, Humana-Paredes: 81.1.
Make your case for Drča vs Humana-Paredes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.