Who is better, Bolt or Fraser-Pryce?
Usain Bolt leads with a GOAT score of 93.2 against 91.2 for Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce — a gap of 2.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Usain Bolt above Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce: 93.2 vs 91.2. Usain Bolt leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bolt wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Fraser-Pryce wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/bolt-vs-fraser-pryce
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bolt leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Fraser-Pryce — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | BoltRetired | Fraser-PryceActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 8 | 3 |
| World golds | 11 | — |
| World records | 3 | — |
| 100m best (s) | 9.58 | — |
| 200m best (s) | 19.19 | — |
| Global finals won | 19 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 10 |
| Olympic medals | — | 8 |
| 100 m personal best | — | 10.6 |
| World 100 m titles | — | 5 |
| Sub-10.8 races | — | 40 |
| Dominance w25% | 98 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 98 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 95 | 90 |
Usain Bolt leads with a GOAT score of 93.2 against 91.2 for Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce — a gap of 2.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Fraser-Pryce scores higher on longevity. Bolt leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bolt: 93.2, Fraser-Pryce: 91.2.
Make your case for Bolt vs Fraser-Pryce. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.