Who is better, Bolt or Abdelrahman?
Usain Bolt leads with a GOAT score of 93.2 against 74.0 for Ihab Abdelrahman — a gap of 19.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Usain Bolt above Ihab Abdelrahman: 93.2 vs 74.0. Usain Bolt leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bolt wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Abdelrahman wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/bolt-vs-ihab-abdelrahman
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bolt leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Abdelrahman — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | BoltRetired | AbdelrahmanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 8 | — |
| World golds | 11 | — |
| World records | 3 | — |
| 100m best (s) | 9.58 | — |
| 200m best (s) | 19.19 | — |
| Global finals won | 19 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| Personal best (m) | — | 89.21 |
| African Championship titles | — | 2 |
| Diamond League podiums | — | 4 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 98 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 98 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 95 | 76 |
Usain Bolt leads with a GOAT score of 93.2 against 74.0 for Ihab Abdelrahman — a gap of 19.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Abdelrahman does not lead any of the five categories; Bolt is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bolt: 93.2, Abdelrahman: 74.0.
Make your case for Bolt vs Abdelrahman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.