Who is better, Salming or O'Connor?
Buddy O'Connor leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.5 for Börje Salming — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Buddy O'Connor above Börje Salming: 82.6 vs 82.5. Buddy O'Connor leads on Honours, Peak, Dominance. Börje Salming leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →O'Connor wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Salming wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/borje-salming-vs-buddy-oconnor
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
O'Connor leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Salming | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 337 |
| 🇨🇦 O'Connor | 0 | 0 | 58 | 122 | 350 | 687 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Buddy O'Connor leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.5 for Börje Salming — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Salming scores higher on longevity. O'Connor leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Salming: 82.5, O'Connor: 82.6.
Make your case for Salming vs O'Connor. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.