Who is better, Salming or Patrick?
Frank Patrick leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.5 for Börje Salming — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Frank Patrick above Börje Salming: 82.6 vs 82.5. Frank Patrick leads on Honours, Peak, Dominance. Börje Salming leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Patrick wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Salming wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/borje-salming-vs-frank-patrick
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Patrick leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Salming | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 337 |
| 🇨🇦 Patrick | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 371 | 657 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SalmingRetired | PatrickRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NHL points | 787 | — |
| All-Star selections | 6 | — |
| Games played | 1,148 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Assists | 637 | — |
| Stanley Cups | — | 1 |
| PCHA titles | — | 2 |
| Goals in a game by a defenceman | — | 6 |
| Professional seasons | — | 10 |
| Rule innovations credited | — | 20 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 84 |
Frank Patrick leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.5 for Börje Salming — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Salming scores higher on longevity. Patrick leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Salming: 82.5, Patrick: 82.6.
Make your case for Salming vs Patrick. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.