Who is better, Salming or Draisaitl?
Börje Salming leads with a GOAT score of 82.5 against 82.5 for Leon Draisaitl — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Börje Salming and Leon Draisaitl level at 82.5. Börje Salming leads on Longevity. Leon Draisaitl leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Salming wins: Longevity
Draisaitl wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/borje-salming-vs-leon-draisaitl
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Salming leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Salming | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 337 |
| 🇩🇪 Draisaitl | 0 | 0 | 9 | 60 | 312 | 744 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SalmingRetired | DraisaitlActive · Edmonton Oilers |
|---|---|---|
| NHL points | 787 | 1,000 |
| All-Star selections | 6 | — |
| Games played | 1,148 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Assists | 637 | — |
| Hart Trophies | — | 1 |
| Art Ross Trophies | — | 1 |
| Rocket Richard Trophies | — | 2 |
| Points per game | — | 1.21 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 90 |
Börje Salming leads with a GOAT score of 82.5 against 82.5 for Leon Draisaitl — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Draisaitl scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Salming leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Salming: 82.5, Draisaitl: 82.5.
Make your case for Salming vs Draisaitl. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.