Who is better, BoxeR or N0tail?
Johan "N0tail" Sundstein leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.3 for BoxeR — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Johan "N0tail" Sundstein above BoxeR: 82.4 vs 82.3. Johan "N0tail" Sundstein leads on Honours, Longevity, Statistics. BoxeR leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →N0tail wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
BoxeR wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/boxer-lim-yo-hwan-vs-n0tail
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
N0tail leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 BoxeR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 268 | 468 |
| 🇩🇰 N0tail | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 35 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BoxeRRetired | N0tailRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Starleague titles | 2 | — |
| Starleague finals | 4 | — |
| Proleague titles | 2 | — |
| WCG golds | 2 | — |
| Career premier wins | 6 | — |
| The International titles | — | 2 |
| Major titles | — | 4 |
| Career prize money (USD) | — | 7,100,000 |
| Premier tournament wins | — | 12 |
| TI finals | — | 2 |
| Years at tier-1 level | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 80 |
Johan "N0tail" Sundstein leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.3 for BoxeR — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
BoxeR scores higher on peak, dominance. N0tail leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. BoxeR: 82.3, N0tail: 82.4.
Make your case for BoxeR vs N0tail. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.