Who is better, Bradman or Cummins?
Donald Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 93.6 against 89.9 for Pat Cummins — a gap of 3.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Donald Bradman above Pat Cummins: 93.6 vs 89.9. Donald Bradman leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak. Pat Cummins leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bradman wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Cummins wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/bradman-vs-pat-cummins
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bradman leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cummins — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Cummins — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | BradmanRetired · New South Wales / South Australia | CumminsActive · Sunrisers Hyderabad |
|---|---|---|
| Test batting average | 99.94 | — |
| Test centuries | 29 | — |
| Test runs | 6,996 | — |
| Double centuries | 12 | — |
| Tests played | 52 | — |
| Ashes series won | 8 | — |
| Test wickets | — | 294 |
| World Cup titles | — | 2 |
| World Test Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Bowling average | — | 22 |
| Ashes series wins | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 100 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 100 | 92 |
Donald Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 93.6 against 89.9 for Pat Cummins — a gap of 3.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Cummins scores higher on longevity. Bradman leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bradman: 93.6, Cummins: 89.9.
Make your case for Bradman vs Cummins. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.