Who is better, Bradman or Sharma?
Donald Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 93.6 against 18.4 for Raghu Sharma — a gap of 75.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Bradman vs Sharma
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Donald Bradman above Raghu Sharma: 93.6 vs 18.4. Donald Bradman leads on Dominance, Statistics, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BradmanWinner
93.6Bradman wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Sharma
18.4Sharma wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/bradman-vs-ros-raghu-sharma
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Donald Bradman
93.6
Bradman leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Sharma — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Donald Bradman
2. Raghu Sharma
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 21 · Form index per season
1. 🇦🇺 Donald Bradman1,442 runs
2 seasons by age 21 · 721 per season
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Sharma — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Bradman93.6
Sharma18.4
FAQ
Where does Sharma beat Bradman?
Sharma does not lead any of the five categories; Bradman is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Bradman vs Sharma score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bradman: 93.6, Sharma: 18.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Bradman vs Sharma. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.