Who is better, Bradman or Foulkes?
Donald Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 93.6 against 13.7 for Zak Foulkes — a gap of 79.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Bradman vs Foulkes
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BradmanWinner
93.6Bradman wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Foulkes
13.7Foulkes wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/bradman-vs-ros-zak-foulkes
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Donald Bradman
93.6
Bradman leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Foulkes — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Donald Bradman
2. Zak Foulkes
Category breakdown
Season form · Centuries per year
Career timeline · Centuries per year
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 21 · Centuries per year
1. 🇦🇺 Donald Bradman1,442 runs
2 seasons by age 21 · 721 per season
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Foulkes — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | BradmanRetired · New South Wales / South Australia | FoulkesActive · Chennai Super Kings |
|---|---|---|
| Test batting average | 99.94 | — |
| Test centuries | 29 | — |
| Test runs | 6,996 | — |
| Double centuries | 12 | — |
| Tests played | 52 | — |
| Ashes series won | 8 | — |
| Matches (T20 leagues + internationals) | — | 27 |
| Runs | — | 137 |
| Wickets | — | 40 |
| Dominance w25% | 100 | 13.3 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 18.9 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 11.3 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 9.3 |
| Statistics w15% | 100 | 16.2 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Bradman93.6
Foulkes13.7
FAQ
Where does Foulkes beat Bradman?
Foulkes does not lead any of the five categories; Bradman is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Bradman vs Foulkes score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bradman: 93.6, Foulkes: 13.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Bradman vs Foulkes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.