Who is better, Brady or Jackson?
Tom Brady leads with a GOAT score of 97.2 against 61.7 for Lamar Jackson — a gap of 35.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Brady wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Jackson wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/brady-vs-ros-lamar-jackson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Brady leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 24
No verified birth date for Jackson — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 24, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | BradyRetired · Tampa Bay Buccaneers | JacksonActive · Baltimore Ravens |
|---|---|---|
| Super Bowl rings | 7 | — |
| Super Bowl MVP | 5 | — |
| League MVP | 3 | — |
| Passing yards | 89,214 | — |
| Passing touchdowns | 649 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 15 | — |
| NFL games | — | 116 |
| NFL yards | — | 29,130 |
| NFL award: NFL MVP | — | 2 |
| NFL award: Heisman Trophy | — | 1 |
| NFL award: Maxwell Award | — | 1 |
| NFL award: Walter Camp Award | — | 1 |
| Heisman Trophy | — | 1 |
| Maxwell Award | — | 1 |
| Walter Camp Award | — | 1 |
| The Sporting News College Football Player of the Year | — | 1 |
| ACC Athlete of the Year | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 98 | 62.1 |
| Peak w20% | 93 | 74.3 |
| Longevity w20% | 100 | 50.6 |
| Honours w20% | 99 | 50 |
| Statistics w15% | 95 | 74.5 |
Tom Brady leads with a GOAT score of 97.2 against 61.7 for Lamar Jackson — a gap of 35.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Jackson does not lead any of the five categories; Brady is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Brady: 97.2, Jackson: 61.7.
Make your case for Brady vs Jackson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.