Who is better, Chastain or Ertz?
Brandi Chastain leads with a GOAT score of 87.2 against 87.2 for Julie Ertz — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Chastain vs Ertz
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Brandi Chastain and Julie Ertz level at 87.2. Brandi Chastain leads on Longevity. Julie Ertz leads on Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChastainWinner
87.2Chastain wins: Longevity
Ertz
87.2Ertz wins: Dominance, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/brandi-chastain-v-vs-julie-ertz-v
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Brandi Chastain
87.2
Chastain leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Brandi Chastain
2. Julie Ertz
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Julie Ertz5 seasons played · career day 1,825342 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Brandi Chastain5 seasons played · career day 1,826302 goals
-11.7% vs Ertz at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Chastain | 0 | 0 | 52 | 108 | 233 | 619 |
| 🇺🇸 Ertz | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 342 | 682 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Chastain87.2
Ertz87.2
FAQ
Where does Ertz beat Chastain?
Ertz scores higher on dominance, statistics. Chastain leads on longevity.
How is the Chastain vs Ertz score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chastain: 87.2, Ertz: 87.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Chastain vs Ertz. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.