Who is better, Mihajlović or Kaziyski?
Brankica Mihajlović leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.6 for Matey Kaziyski — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Brankica Mihajlović above Matey Kaziyski: 82.7 vs 82.6. Brankica Mihajlović leads on Honours. Matey Kaziyski leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Mihajlović wins: Honours
Kaziyski wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/brankica-mihajlovic-vs-matey-kaziyski
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mihajlović leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇸 Mihajlović | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 258 | 708 |
| 🇧🇬 Kaziyski | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 348 | 718 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MihajlovićActive | KaziyskiActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| European titles | 2 | — |
| Nations League medals | 2 | — |
| Years with the national team | 17 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| Italian league titles | — | 4 |
| Champions League titles | — | 2 |
| Club World Championship titles | — | 3 |
| Years at the top level | — | 22 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 82 |
Brankica Mihajlović leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.6 for Matey Kaziyski — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kaziyski scores higher on statistics, longevity. Mihajlović leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mihajlović: 82.7, Kaziyski: 82.6.
Make your case for Mihajlović vs Kaziyski. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.