Who is better, Mihajlović or T. Crabb?
Taylor Crabb leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.7 for Brankica Mihajlović — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Taylor Crabb above Brankica Mihajlović: 82.8 vs 82.7. Taylor Crabb leads on Statistics, Dominance. Brankica Mihajlović leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →T. Crabb wins: Dominance, Statistics
Mihajlović wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/brankica-mihajlovic-vs-taylor-crabb
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
T. Crabb leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇸 Mihajlović | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 258 | 708 |
| 🇺🇸 T. Crabb | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 310 | 658 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MihajlovićActive | T. CrabbActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| European titles | 2 | — |
| Nations League medals | 2 | — |
| Years with the national team | 17 | — |
| AVP titles | — | 12 |
| World Tour medals | — | 4 |
| AVP best defender awards | — | 3 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| NCAA titles | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 88 |
Taylor Crabb leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.7 for Brankica Mihajlović — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Mihajlović scores higher on honours, longevity. T. Crabb leads on dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mihajlović: 82.7, T. Crabb: 82.8.
Make your case for Mihajlović vs T. Crabb. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.