Who is better, Hansen or Franklin?
Brendan Hansen leads with a GOAT score of 81.8 against 81.8 for Missy Franklin — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Brendan Hansen and Missy Franklin level at 81.8. Brendan Hansen leads on Longevity. Missy Franklin leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hansen wins: Longevity
Franklin wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/brendan-hansen-vs-missy-franklin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hansen leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Hansen | 0 | 0 | 62 | 136 | 308 | 748 |
| 🇺🇸 Franklin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 126 | 500.56 | 885.06 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HansenRetired | FranklinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 3 | — |
| Olympic medals | 6 | 6 |
| World Championship golds | 4 | 11 |
| World records set | 5 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 5 |
| World records | — | 2 |
| 200 m backstroke record (s) | — | 124.06 |
| Golds at one Worlds | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Brendan Hansen leads with a GOAT score of 81.8 against 81.8 for Missy Franklin — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Franklin scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Hansen leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hansen: 81.8, Franklin: 81.8.
Make your case for Hansen vs Franklin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.