Who is better, Hartley or Villeneuve?
Brendon Hartley leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.0 for Jacques Villeneuve — a gap of 0.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Brendon Hartley above Jacques Villeneuve: 83.6 vs 83.0. Brendon Hartley leads on Longevity, Statistics. Jacques Villeneuve leads on Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hartley wins: Longevity, Statistics
Villeneuve wins: Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/brendon-hartley-vs-jacques-villeneuve-f1
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hartley leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇿 Hartley | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 15 | 27 |
| 🇨🇦 Villeneuve | 0 | 0 | 40 | 99 | 359 | 612 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HartleyActive | VilleneuveRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Le Mans overall wins | 3 | — |
| World Endurance titles | 2 | — |
| Grand Prix starts | 25 | — |
| WEC race wins | 20 | — |
| Career F1 points | 4 | — |
| Formula 1 world titles | — | 1 |
| Grand Prix wins | — | 11 |
| Podiums | — | 23 |
| Pole positions | — | 13 |
| Indianapolis 500 wins | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Brendon Hartley leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.0 for Jacques Villeneuve — a gap of 0.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Villeneuve scores higher on peak, honours. Hartley leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hartley: 83.6, Villeneuve: 83.0.
Make your case for Hartley vs Villeneuve. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.