Who is better, Brinkley or Wilkie?
Brian Brinkley leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.6 for David Wilkie — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Brian Brinkley and David Wilkie level at 81.6. Brian Brinkley leads on Longevity, Statistics. David Wilkie leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Brinkley wins: Longevity, Statistics
Wilkie wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/brian-brinkley-vs-david-wilkie
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Brinkley leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Brinkley | 0 | 0 | 50 | 111 | 360 | 614 |
| 🇬🇧 Wilkie | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BrinkleyRetired | WilkieRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth Games gold medals | 2 | — |
| European Championship medals | 3 | — |
| British titles | 10 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 2 | — |
| Olympic finals | 3 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship golds | — | 3 |
| Commonwealth golds | — | 2 |
| World records | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Brian Brinkley leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.6 for David Wilkie — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Wilkie scores higher on peak, dominance. Brinkley leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Brinkley: 81.6, Wilkie: 81.6.
Make your case for Brinkley vs Wilkie. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.