GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Close vs Barnett

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CloseWinner
85.4

Close wins: Longevity, Honours

Barnett
85.4

Barnett wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/brian-close-vs-charlie-barnett

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Brian Close
85.4

Close leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. England's youngest Test debutant at 18 and a fearless short-leg fielder.

1. Brian Close
85.4
2. Charlie Barnett
85.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Charlie Barnett5 years played · career day 1,825271 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Brian Close5 years played · career day 1,825255 runs
-5.9% vs Barnett at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Close004593255513
🇬🇧 Barnett004595271569

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricCloseRetiredBarnettRetired
First-class runs34,99425,389
First-class wickets1,171
First-class catches813
Tests played22
Seasons in first-class cricket37
Test runs1,098
Test centuries2
First-class centuries48
Runs before lunch in 193898
Dominance w25%7880
Peak w20%8692
Longevity w20%9688
Honours w20%8078
Statistics w15%9092

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Close85.4
Barnett85.4
The people
Close
Barnett

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Close vs Barnett. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →