Who is better, Close or Vaughan?
Brian Close leads with a GOAT score of 85.4 against 85.4 for Michael Vaughan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Brian Close and Michael Vaughan level at 85.4. Brian Close leads on Longevity. Michael Vaughan leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Close wins: Longevity
Vaughan wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/brian-close-vs-michael-vaughan
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Close leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Close | 0 | 0 | 45 | 93 | 255 | 513 |
| 🇬🇧 Vaughan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 128 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CloseRetired | VaughanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| First-class runs | 34,994 | — |
| First-class wickets | 1,171 | — |
| First-class catches | 813 | — |
| Tests played | 22 | — |
| Seasons in first-class cricket | 37 | — |
| Ashes series won as captain | — | 1 |
| Test wins as captain | — | 26 |
| Test runs | — | 5,719 |
| Test centuries | — | 18 |
| Test runs in 2002 | — | 1,481 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 92 |
Brian Close leads with a GOAT score of 85.4 against 85.4 for Michael Vaughan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Vaughan scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Close leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Close: 85.4, Vaughan: 85.4.
Make your case for Close vs Vaughan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.