Who is better, Urlacher or Covert?
Jim Covert leads with a GOAT score of 79.7 against 79.6 for Brian Urlacher — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jim Covert above Brian Urlacher: 79.7 vs 79.6. Jim Covert leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Brian Urlacher leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Covert wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Urlacher wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/brian-urlacher-vs-jim-covert
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Covert leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Urlacher | 0 | 0 | 125 | 273 | 640 | 1,307 |
| 🇺🇸 Covert | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 20 | 26 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | UrlacherRetired | CovertRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Defensive Player of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 8 | 2 |
| All-Pro first teams | 4 | — |
| Career tackles | 1,361 | — |
| Career interceptions | 22 | — |
| Super Bowl titles | — | 1 |
| First-team All-Pro selections | — | 2 |
| Games played | — | 111 |
| All-Decade team selections | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 64 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Jim Covert leads with a GOAT score of 79.7 against 79.6 for Brian Urlacher — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Urlacher scores higher on longevity. Covert leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Urlacher: 79.6, Covert: 79.7.
Make your case for Urlacher vs Covert. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.